Data-driven articles based on findings from our own survey research.
Each piece links back to the underlying benchmark report for the full tables and methodology.
August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans, law librarians, legal publishers, curriculum committees and faculty-development leaders
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, library directors, provosts, deans and institutional-planning teams
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library directors, special-collections heads, development officers, provosts and donors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, conservators, library directors, facilities teams and preservation vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections managers, library directors, HR leaders, provosts and professional associations
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library directors, campus-security leaders, student-affairs teams, facilities officers and risk managers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Computer-science deans, research offices, publishers, AI developers, counsel and faculty-governance leaders
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library-school leaders, faculty senates, scholarly-communications librarians, publishers and university counsel
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library directors, assessment librarians, provosts, UX teams and survey-platform vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library facilities leaders, assessment teams, privacy officers, campus IT and occupancy-technology vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections heads, university archivists, advancement offices, donors and library administrators
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, rights managers, library business officers, publishers and image-licensing teams
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Archivists, special-collections leaders, discovery vendors, metadata teams and UX researchers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Digitization managers, special-collections leaders, library directors, funders and imaging vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, development officers, grant writers, library directors and foundations
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, outreach librarians, faculty, development teams and community-relations offices
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library directors, campus facilities teams, preservation leaders, sustainability officers and architects
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library facilities leaders, architects, furniture vendors, student-success teams and campus planners
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library directors, campus facilities leaders, provosts, finance officers and capital-planning teams
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library IT leaders, facilities planners, student-success teams, accessibility staff and computer vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans, curriculum committees, clinical faculty, employers and accreditation leaders
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans, trustees, regulators, curriculum planners and legal-education policy analysts
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans, financial-aid offices, public-interest centers, foundations and prospective students
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Computer-science deans, research offices, conflict-of-interest committees, technology firms and faculty
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library-school deans, research offices, faculty, associations and foundations
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library-science faculty, research administrators, grant offices, associations and policymakers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans, online-program leaders, faculty, accreditors and education-technology providers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Survey of American College Students 2025, Use of Academic Library Chatbots & Chat Services
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law faculty, law librarians, knowledge-management teams, legal-tech vendors and curriculum committees
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Research offices, provosts, deans, institutional-research teams and faculty
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Research administrators, deans, faculty, finance offices and grant-support consultants
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Provosts, research offices, faculty-affairs leaders, deans and conference organizers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Research-office leaders, provosts, deans, faculty and proposal-development consultants
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans, faculty, simulation-center leaders, law librarians and education-technology vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school IT leaders, faculty, law librarians, privacy officers and cloud-service providers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Assessment officers, provosts, faculty-development leaders, accreditors and learning-platform vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Chief assessment officers, institutional-research leaders, provosts, faculty and AI vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Academic-advising leaders, provosts, student-success teams, deans and retention officers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Advising directors, student-success leaders, campus IT, faculty advisers and collaboration-platform vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Tutoring-program directors, faculty, student-success leaders, provosts and learning-center staff
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Law-school technology leaders, law librarians, faculty-development teams and cloud vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, museum directors, digitization managers, funders and preservation vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library and museum leaders, risk managers, digitization labs, insurers and preservation consultants
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Department chairs, advancement teams, alumni-relations offices, deans and event planners
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Department chairs, deans, advancement officers, faculty leaders and higher-education consultants
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Tutoring directors, student-success teams, academic affairs leaders and online-learning vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Learning-center directors, student-employment offices, faculty, finance leaders and tutoring-platform vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Data librarians, library directors, research offices, faculty-development teams and campus IT
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Research leaders, faculty, data librarians, AI vendors and university technology officers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Provosts, career-services leaders, faculty-development teams, employers and AI-education providers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, library directors, risk managers, campus security and insurers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections managers, preservation leaders, facilities teams, risk officers and insurers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library-school deans, curriculum committees, employers, faculty and professional associations
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, metadata librarians, archivists, discovery vendors and library directors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Provosts, faculty, teaching centers, libraries, career-services teams and students
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library IT leaders, e-resource managers, campus identity teams, publishers and access vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Scholarly-communications librarians, repository managers, faculty, archivists and podcast producers
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library directors, instruction librarians, research offices, faculty and scholarly-discovery vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library makerspace leaders, engineering educators, student-success teams, campus planners and equipment vendors
Read more » August 31, 2026 · Written for Library-school deans, faculty, employers, students, accreditors and professional associations
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Special-collections heads, archivists, digital-preservation staff, library directors and funders
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Library directors, licensing librarians, privacy officers, counsel, procurement teams and vendors
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans, curriculum committees, law librarians, career offices and legal employers
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Research offices, academic libraries, faculty-development teams, provosts and discovery vendors
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Repository managers, scholarly-communications librarians, research offices and university presses
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Library directors, provosts, budget officers, publishers, streaming providers and recruiters
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Library-school deans, faculty, accreditation leaders, employers and professional associations
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Law-library directors, law-school deans, firm librarians, legal publishers and space planners
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Law-library directors, deans, managing partners, HR leaders and legal-information vendors
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Library directors, facilities officers, provosts, architects, furniture vendors and donors
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Provosts, student-affairs leaders, faculty senates, teaching centers and academic-integrity teams
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Enrollment leaders, college marketers, communications teams, agencies and marketing-technology vendors
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Interlibrary-loan managers, resource-sharing consortia, library directors and automation vendors
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Special-collections directors, development officers, grant writers, digitization vendors and donors
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Tutoring-center directors, student-success leaders, provosts, edtech vendors and academic libraries
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Library-technology leaders, electronic-resources teams, CIOs, vendors and access-services staff
Read more » August 30, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, library directors, risk managers, campus security and insurers
Read more » August 26, 2026 · Written for Library directors, AI working groups, research-support leaders and library-technology vendors
Read more » August 26, 2026 · Written for academic Library directors, university librarians, AI specialists, electronic-resources teams, procurement officers, CIOs and AI vendors
Read more » August 26, 2026 · Written for Law-firm partners, law librarians, knowledge leaders, legal-operations teams and publishers, law school faculty
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Academic-library directors, provosts, CIOs, staff-development leaders and library vendors
Primary Research Group's survey of ~50 academic-library directors: research universities lead productivity gains, and 15% report a dramatic positive effect on AI-literacy instruction.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Metadata managers, repository leaders, systems librarians, consultants and remediation vendors
Primary Research Group finds 63% of metadata librarians rate remediation a high strategic priority, but 58% cite staffing as the primary obstacle.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Academic-library directors, technical-services leaders, human-resources teams and recruiters
Primary Research Group finds more than 70% of cataloging and metadata departments rate staffing below adequate, with 44% expecting demand for metadata specialists.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Library directors, campus facilities officers, architects, furniture vendors and student-success leaders
Primary Research Group finds 53.3% of academic libraries have reduced print-stack space in the past three years to expand user space. But 45% have no current space plan.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Technical-services directors, metadata librarians, systems vendors and library-school educators
Primary Research Group's survey of cataloging librarians: 74.47% are interested in linked data, but only 17.02% believe they have adequate BIBFRAME training.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Library-school faculty, academic libraries, professional associations and AI-training providers
Primary Research Group finds 31% of library-science faculty have used a prompt library, but only 9% have contributed prompts back — and none use an academic library to share them.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Computer-science deans, curriculum committees, teaching centers and employers
Primary Research Group's survey of CS faculty: only 8.70% believe their department is ahead of peers in teaching AI-assisted coding. Ownership of cross-disciplinary AI training remains unsettled.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Law-firm professional-development, risk, ethics, innovation and knowledge-management leaders
Primary Research Group finds 63% of law firms now offer AI training, but only 14.29% covers verifying AI output accuracy — one of the technology's most important professional risks.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Managing partners, legal-operations leaders, knowledge-management teams and legal-tech vendors
Primary Research Group finds 55% of attorneys believe AI will let firms handle more matters without adding headcount, but only 14% report AI has enhanced profitability yet.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Provosts, student-affairs leaders, teaching centers, academic libraries and AI vendors
Primary Research Group's Survey of College Students 2025: ChatGPT leads at 64.77% monthly use, but Copilot, Gemini, and Claude are already meaningful shares. Use varies sharply by tuition tier.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Law-firm leaders, legal-technology vendors, legal publishers and consultants
Primary Research Group's survey of law-firm attorneys finds midsize firms (50-150 lawyers) are the most bullish on expanding generative-AI use: 64.71% expect significant expansion.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Special-collections leaders, repository managers, library directors and preservation vendors
Primary Research Group found 50% of academic-library special collections use a dedicated digital-preservation system, but more than half spend under $10,000 a year on it.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Law-school deans and faculty, law firms, career services and prospective students
Primary Research Group surveyed 114 law-school faculty on AI's impact on legal education. Only 16.67% believe demand for associates has already fallen, but nearly half expect it will.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Academic-library leaders, faculty-development offices and provosts
A Primary Research Group survey of 660 higher-education faculty found only 8% have a dedicated AI librarian available. Discoverability, not activity, may be the real issue.
Read more » August 21, 2026 · Written for Metadata librarians, technical-services directors and academic-library leaders
Primary Research Group's survey of 47 metadata librarians shows AI adoption in cataloging is advancing faster than confidence, policy, or institutional support.
Read more »