Is Online Academic Advising Becoming Standard?
Published August 31, 2026 · Written for Advising directors, student-success leaders, campus IT, faculty advisers and collaboration-platform vendors
p
strongOnline advising is established, but institutions are still choosing among video platforms, peer support and traditional appointments rather than converging on one model./strong/p
p
Primary Research Group found that 27.27% of sampled advising programs used Microsoft Teams frequently. Larger and public institutions were more likely than smaller or private colleges to use online peer mentors. The report also examines remote work, chatboxes, session practices and the division of advising between faculty and dedicated staff./p
p
Online access can reduce travel and scheduling barriers, particularly for commuters, working students and those studying away from campus. It can also weaken the conversation if advisers lack access to records, students join from distracting settings or complex decisions are pushed through short text exchanges./p
p
Programs should match channel to need. Routine registration questions may be handled through messaging or group sessions academic recovery, transfer planning and major changes may warrant a longer video or in-person meeting. Identity verification, private space and accessible technology should be part of the service design./p
p
The strongest hybrid model gives students a clear choice without creating separate levels of service. Response time, resolution and student outcomes should be compared across channels so convenience does not quietly become lower-quality advising./p
p
 /p
Want the full benchmark?
Academic Advising Benchmarks 2025
contains the detailed tables, subgroup breakouts, and methodology.
View the report, sample pages, and licensing options »