This timely report provides an in-depth look at how law faculty across the United States perceive and respond to the Trump Administration’s actions affecting law schools, law firms, and the broader legal sector.
Key Findings of this 100-page report:
-
Overwhelming Opposition to Punitive Efforts: Nearly 79% of faculty view the Trump Administration’s attempts to punish law firms employing attorneys who opposed the administration as a “dangerous and illegal effort to undermine the US legal system.” Only 4% expressed support for these actions.
-
Academic Freedom at Risk: 78% of respondents are concerned that political scrutiny will limit academic freedom in law schools, with concern highest among older, left-leaning, and international law faculty.
-
Faculty Activism and Institutional Response: About one-third of faculty have taken action to oppose the administration’s efforts, primarily through petitions. However, most faculty report no direct involvement.
-
Divided Views on Law School Stance: While 45% of faculty favor open institutional support for law firms resisting federal intimidation, 37% prefer neutrality—especially among younger and conservative faculty.
-
Speech and Accreditation Concerns: 71% expect faculty speech outside the classroom to come under political pressure, and most anticipate at least some impact on law school accreditation from changes in federal oversight.
Report Contents: The report presents detailed survey data and analysis on faculty views regarding:
-
The Trump Administration’s efforts to influence law firms and legal education
-
Perceived student reactions to law firms’ cooperation with the administration
-
Faculty activism and protest actions
-
Law school policies and support for academic freedom
-
Anticipated effects on accreditation and faculty speech
-
Stakeholder influence on law school responses
-
Open-ended faculty recommendations for protecting academic independence
The study includes subgroup analyses by age, academic rank, political orientation, field of law, and institutional characteristics, as well as extensive open-ended commentary from faculty.