Survey of Academic Library Special Collections: Budget Priorities | Primary Research Group

Survey of Academic Library Special Collections: Budget Priorities (ISBN No:979-8-88517-364-3 )

Survey of Academic Library Special Collections: Budget Priorities — report cover

This study examines funding satisfaction, budget, donor-designated funds, funding predictability, long-term project funding, service reductions, grant-seeking, and the areas of special collections most affected by resource shortages.

The report is based on a sample of 26 academic institutions, including 18 public and 8 private institutions; 16 research universities and 10 other types of institutions. The central finding is that special collections funding is widely viewed as inadequate and often insufficiently predictable for long-term planning.

Only 19.23% of respondents are satisfied or very satisfied with current funding for special collections, while 50.00% are dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Funding strain is especially severe among the largest institutions, where 66.67% of institutions with more than 40,000 FTE are very dissatisfied.

Special collections often receives a small or unclear share of institutional budgets. 38.46% of respondents are not sure what percentage of the total budget is dedicated to special collections, while 34.62% say it is under 10%. Only 3.85% report that special collections accounts for 40% or more of the total budget.

Donor-designated funds help but are not universal. 42.31% receive donor-designated funds for special collections, and another 19.23% do so sometimes. Institutions with 20,000–40,000 FTE are especially likely to receive such funds, with 85.71% answering yes.

Funding conditions have concrete service consequences. 38.46% say budget constraints have forced them to reduce services or programs, and another 26.92% say this has happened somewhat. Staffing is the dominant resource shortage: 57.69% rank staffing as the most severe shortage, far ahead of storage, digitization, preservation, technology, or outreach.

Grant-seeking is common but not intensive for most respondents. 23.08% pursue grants or external funding frequently, 38.46% occasionally, 23.08% rarely, and 7.69% never. Open-ended comments point to the need for stable budget lines, more full-time staff, stronger donor development, endowments, and better links between collection donations and financial support.

 

Higher Education Management

Report coverage in this topic area includes: marketing, enrollment and public relations; advancement and fundraising; international and domestic student services; retention and assessment; technology management, facilities managment, and much more.

Higher Education Management category

Law Firm and Law Library Management

Reports in this area can be roughly grouped into 4 types: surveys of law libraries, surveys of attorneys in major law firms, surveys of management personnel in major law firms, and surveys of law school faculty and administrators.

Law Firm and Law Library Management category

Libraries

Subject areas covered include: content management, materials purchasing, facilities management, digitization, purchasing and negotiations, open access and digital repositories, personnel management and training, budgeting, fundraising and much more.

Libraries category
© Reserved 2014

Designed and Developed by BSD InfoTech